← Back to Global Dashboard

Global Gravity Trend Analysis

Collective gravity changes across all 14 monitored tectonic regions

Global Gravity Increasing
Earth's gravity field is strengthening globally. In the Ashebo Model, increasing gravity indicates restoration field asymmetry intensifying—insufficient outward thermal energy to balance gravitational compression. Mass-energy concentration without adequate thermal release creates instability.
Average Gravity Change
+3.95 mGal
Total Gravity Change
+55.32 mGal
Increasing Gravity
7
50.0% of regions
Asymmetry intensifying - insufficient thermal energy
Decreasing Gravity
7
50.0% of regions
Active restoration - thermal energy release
Stable Gravity
0
0.0% of regions
Within ±5 mGal of baseline
Gravity Anomaly Trends Over Time
Historical gravity changes for all monitored regions
12/212/612/1012/1512/2012/2512/301/31/61/101/141/181/221/261/302/32/62/92/132/172/212/26-70-3503570Gravity Anomaly (mGal)
  • Afar Triangle
  • Yellowstone Caldera
  • Cascadia Subduction Zone
  • Japan Trench
  • Iceland Rift Zone
  • Sunda Arc

Showing top 6 regions by baseline gravity magnitude. Chart displays 90-day historical trends with simulated variations around baseline values.

Top 5 Largest Gravity Anomalies
Regions with the most significant gravity changes
#1
Afar Triangle
Baseline: -62.0 mGal → Current: 7.5 mGal
+69.52 mGal
+112.1% change
#2
Kenya Rift Valley
Baseline: -50.0 mGal → Current: -4.2 mGal
+45.77 mGal
+91.5% change
#3
Iceland Rift Zone
Baseline: -40.0 mGal → Current: -5.1 mGal
+34.88 mGal
+87.2% change
#4
Peru-Chile Trench
Baseline: 40.0 mGal → Current: 6.1 mGal
-33.86 mGal
-84.7% change
#5
Aleutian Arc
Baseline: 30.0 mGal → Current: -2.9 mGal
-32.91 mGal
-109.7% change
All Monitored Regions
Complete gravity analysis for all 14 regions
RegionBaselineCurrentChangeTrend
Afar Triangle
extreme risk
-62.0 mGal7.5 mGal+69.52 mGal
Increasing
Yellowstone Caldera
extreme risk
-30.0 mGal-3.6 mGal+26.42 mGal
Increasing
Cascadia Subduction Zone
extreme risk
20.0 mGal-2.6 mGal-22.58 mGal
Decreasing
Japan Trench
extreme risk
25.0 mGal4.8 mGal-20.17 mGal
Decreasing
Iceland Rift Zone
high risk
-40.0 mGal-5.1 mGal+34.88 mGal
Increasing
Sunda Arc
extreme risk
30.0 mGal3.2 mGal-26.79 mGal
Decreasing
Taupo Volcanic Zone
high risk
-25.0 mGal-1.4 mGal+23.55 mGal
Increasing
Kamchatka Peninsula
high risk
35.0 mGal2.7 mGal-32.33 mGal
Decreasing
Kenya Rift Valley
high risk
-50.0 mGal-4.2 mGal+45.77 mGal
Increasing
Peru-Chile Trench
extreme risk
40.0 mGal6.1 mGal-33.86 mGal
Decreasing
Aleutian Arc
extreme risk
30.0 mGal-2.9 mGal-32.91 mGal
Decreasing
San Andreas Fault
extreme risk
-15.0 mGal-0.9 mGal+14.13 mGal
Increasing
Hellenic Arc
high risk
25.0 mGal3.5 mGal-21.55 mGal
Decreasing
Southwest Indian Ridge
moderate risk
-35.0 mGal-3.8 mGal+31.24 mGal
Increasing
Ashebo Gravity Model Interpretation

Negative Gravity Anomalies (Decreasing): In the Ashebo framework, decreasing gravity indicates restoration field asymmetry. Mass-energy seeks equilibrium through emergent gravitational dynamics. Negative anomalies often precede crustal adjustment, magmatic intrusion, or rifting as the system restores balance.

Positive Gravity Anomalies (Increasing): Increasing gravity signals mass accumulation or restoration field intensification. In subduction zones, this reflects dense oceanic plate descent. Stress accumulation may trigger seismic release when restoration forces exceed material strength thresholds.

Collective Trend Significance: The global average gravity change of +3.95 mGal indicates the Earth's restoration field is currently strengthening. Monitoring these trends helps predict tectonic events before conventional seismic indicators appear.

Last updated: 2/26/2026, 7:33:35 PM